Never forget that YouTube is only a technology platform that allows access to videos. It is never a place to prove ownership or establish real associations between what we see and what we hear. It is not peer-reviewed from a legal identity perspective.
It took me at least 20 videos before I believed that a prodigy violinist girl was actually playing what I heard on YouTube. I do not judge ownership based solely on YouTube. While YouTube helps to provide access to technology, other factors are needed to establish ownership. It's not like we can see their ID number. Despite this, YouTube is a great resource for music history.
It took me at least 20 videos before I believed that a prodigy violinist girl was actually playing what I heard on YouTube. I do not judge ownership based solely on YouTube. While YouTube helps to provide access to technology, other factors are needed to establish ownership. It's not like we can see their ID number. Despite this, YouTube is a great resource for music history.
I wish that when Hurricane Katrina happened in a jazz state, their art and music had been preserved on YouTube. How many jazz performers were lost by this devastating storm in a music-rich state.
While I'm not suggesting that people should prioritize the preservation of art, or their product over their own survival, the technology that YouTube offers can be invaluable for those who want to share their work with the world.
