Peki, 100 bin dolarlık bir evi, icradan 5 bin kat az fiyata alanı ve pahalıya satanı niye suçlu bulmuyoruz. İcra, açık artırma illegal değil ki. Demekki kanunlar uygulamalar, bazen çok değerli bir ürünü olmadık bedele elden çıkarabiliyor.
Bence kanun açığının acısını, Farmakolojik firmadan çıkarmak yerine, ne çok kanun açığı varmış idrak etmeli.
Vicdan diye bedava labaratuarlarda çalışan bilimci doktorlar, doktoralı bilimciler, klinisyenler bence enayilik yapmasın, paranın egemenliği heryerde.
Kısacası, farmakoloji firma sahibi, kanun açığını kullanmış, o kadar. Vicdanlı olmak zorunda değilki adam, doktor değilki ne anlar elindeki ilaç hastalar için önemli, hayati. Parası ile açık artırmadan ucuza ev, araba satın alabilecekken, hatta parasını çöpe atabilecekken, ilaç firması kurduysa, iş başına geçtiyse adama yüklenmesi yanlış, kanun açığı heryerde, ilaç pazarlama dada varmış. Zaten o kişiyi, ucuza aldığı şeyi çok pahalı sattığı için kanun suçlayabilmiş değilmiş.
Kısacası, insani vicdanla emek sarfetmek, yetenek bilgi sarfetmek enayiliktir. Vicdan Emlakçılık da olmadığı gibi, hasta ilaçlarında olmuyorsa, bu insanların kendi seçimidir, aşırı vergiden kaçmasıdır.
İlaç hakları satın alanların borsada kazanmak kaybetmek gibi riskleri var. İlaç firmalarının, bazı ilaçları, kanunsuzluk yapmadan, karaborsa gibi satması kanun açığı, ve vicdanları sömürüye dayalı düzenin çökmesi bence.
Böyle bir durum çok ilginç.
Translation by Google:
When the company that produced the best treatment drug for toxoplasmosis increased the price 5000 times in one day, they blamed the owner of the pharmacology company.
Well, why don't we blame the one who buys a house really cheap and sells it more expensive?
Well, why don't we blame the one who buys a house really cheap and sells it more expensive?
Auction is not illegal. This means that laws and practices can sometimes dispose of a very valuable product at a small price.
I think, instead of removing the pain of the legal deficit from a Pharmacological company head, they should realize how many legal deficits there are.
Maybe, scientists, doctors and clinicians working with low salaries for high humanity aims in health field are fools in humanity love dreams, the dominance of money is everywhere.
In short, the owner of the pharmacology firm exploited the loophole, that's all. The man does not have to be conscientious, he is not a doctor, what does he understand that the medicine in his hand is important for patients, it is vital. While he could buy a house and car cheaply with his money, or even throw his money away, if he founded a pharmaceutical company or took over keeping a medicine on sale as a job, it is wrong to blame the man, there is a legal gap everywhere, then there is unknowns also in drug marketing. I do not think buying cheap, selling in high price is illegal just because he is owning, selling something for consumption. In any case, the law could not accuse that person for selling very expensive what he bought cheaply. It is his belongings, he is free not to sell. He is not selling something by force.
I think, instead of removing the pain of the legal deficit from a Pharmacological company head, they should realize how many legal deficits there are.
Maybe, scientists, doctors and clinicians working with low salaries for high humanity aims in health field are fools in humanity love dreams, the dominance of money is everywhere.
In short, the owner of the pharmacology firm exploited the loophole, that's all. The man does not have to be conscientious, he is not a doctor, what does he understand that the medicine in his hand is important for patients, it is vital. While he could buy a house and car cheaply with his money, or even throw his money away, if he founded a pharmaceutical company or took over keeping a medicine on sale as a job, it is wrong to blame the man, there is a legal gap everywhere, then there is unknowns also in drug marketing. I do not think buying cheap, selling in high price is illegal just because he is owning, selling something for consumption. In any case, the law could not accuse that person for selling very expensive what he bought cheaply. It is his belongings, he is free not to sell. He is not selling something by force.
Personally, i wouldn't work for high humanitarian aims in health science too hard with my brain anymore, commercial education, brainstorming, earnings is always pays brain work much more.
Such a situation is very interesting.
Such a situation is very interesting.
