As usual for the internet criminal yasni.com, yasni.com took a man's ugly insect eyed man twitter.com photo named 'xxxx xxx' from twitter.com, removed its original twitter.com label, and tagged it with my legal name. Yasni.com has all stupid internet criminal workers always taking legal names and incorrectly using them to tag stupid twitter.com man photos.
Figure-photo: An ugly insect shaded narrow-eyed dark man:
when clicked on the this ugly man photo it used to give a yasni.com page which was writing my copyrighted content URL. I wrote to google.com that this man twitter.com photo is not supposed to do anything with my legal name, and yasni.com removed the problematic URL.
gOOGLE.COM SAİD OK removed this photo incorrect label for a hile but later, google.com illegitimate lawyers, fckng any internet law, took this ugly insect eyed man photo, linked it to my legal complaint to screw internet law history forever. Google.com lawyers are not there for law, but abusing law to screw any internet law. Since I had removed yasni.com URL as google.com asked from me, which was giving a link this ugly insect-eyed man photo, google.was supposed to look at the domain of this photo and link it to there.
Fckngly brainless judges from google.com law department lied and lied and lied and lied and took the URL which as reported as the infringing URL, made it a photo(google.com does not have any right to crawl and index the URLs from my Legal Report ) and linked it to my Legal Complaint.
If google.com finds the weird twitter.com profile which hosts above ugly man photo, then google.com is free to crawl the photo. But, stupid fckd brained workers of google.com are nothing , illegimate workers, instead of crwling the hosting domain, they linked it to my legal complaint.
If google.com can not find the URL hich hosts this photo, then should remove it.
The ugly man photo has a specific URL and legally declares that it is nothing to with any URL of my copyrighted content but still hosted on titter.com. Ho fcked brains google.com law people have.
You gogle.com legal department, you arbitrarily take titter.com hosted photos and link it to my legal complints for nothhing but to screw internet and deceit any other stupid of internet.
All I want was to tell google.com tht this ugly-nrro-eyed mn photo is hosted on twitter.com, and google.comis supposed to link it to an twittter.com writing URL. If google.com technology fails do tht, the absolute la does not give ny right to the brainless stupid of google.com to take my valuable name and link to an ugly-disgusting narrow-eyed insect appeared man photo.
This is how google.com law department fcks internet law, there is not even any law person with a sufficient brain, education to understand how google.com fcks internet.
In conclusion, the ugly-insect-narrow-eyed stupid looking man photo is a twitter.com hosted photo, as google.com itself approves, google.com should crawl twitter.com to find the account holding ugly-insect man photo. I always told google.com yasni.com is a fckng internet illegal site, yasni.com pages. Google.com tol me tht yasni.com should remove the link, but stupid google.com ia orker even tht stupid failes to understnd that the problem imge from twitter.com.
The google.com law worker will not understand what is going on with the problem, but one probbly will mnage to teach an animal what lawff is.
If google.com stupid brined workers failes to understand that the URL is holded, publicly shown by a twitter.com account, and google.com is supposed to find this tweter.com,
google.com should pay me money for violating my rights arbitrarily. You google.com compny you need to pay to me for teaching you to understand the sources, hosting style of twittter.com photos or ny photos. Google.com la orkers should pay to me to learn how to find any domain hosting any public photo on internet. Stupid orkers of google.com are not more than a dog takes arbitrarily thinks links incorrect places.
The bright google.com engine creators all died, now only internet criminals in the name of law screwing, again screwing internet law to deceit internet stupids. If I file a second complaint then there will be additional copy of this ugly-man linked to my newer legal complaint. yOU STUPİD GOOGLE.COM l department worker, you should understand the la agreements of your company. Google.com does not have any right to tke ny image and linkit nyhere, if you need to linkit your who knows where. Do not attack to my vlauble name. You are bandit there, you do not know your company promises, you do not know technology, you do not anythink, what the fck you are there and calling it law-related work.
I do not believe that this narrow-eyed ugly man did all thes technicl crime on its own. Maybe likes this crime, or maybe never knos that this photo is broken from twitter.com and linked to allover places.
The law department of google.com is full of stupids.
I should be paid for being a victim.
Twitter.com image URLs all have URLs with xxhttp://a2.twimg.com/....jpg
You stupid google.com law department worker you only deceit the stupids of internet, what you do is nothing to do with law, but in the name of law you only screw internet law.
Instead of fckg internet you need to get some brain to know what hosting, domain, URL means.
You google.com you should pay to me money for all the problem you created to me since you failed to do correct hosting site searches. Google.com declares that it is an twitter.com, but on the other does nothing to search twiitter.com and find the eact account which has this ugly man photo.
(The stupid google.com law department lawyers are illegitimate,
they legally list/see xxhttp://a2.twimg.com/....jpg
but are illegitimate to understand the technical meaning of xxhttp://a2.twimg.com/....jpg
The DMCA law case ugly-narrow-eyed-dark man photo is twitter.com image hosting server. another hosting server example is l.yimg.com from yahoo.com.
Image hosting servers are all known on internet via whois information. Big companies instead of using yahoo.com, or twitter.com or facebook.com, uses image server domains
such as a2.twimg.com (twitter.com)
l.yimg.com (yahoo.com)
fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net (facebook.com)
But, google.com la department workers know technology la less than a street animal-dog.
Although, the man appearing in the phot is ugly-dark-narrow-eyed disturbing photo, I do not believe that this man had that much technology knowledge to do such criminal links, the crime originated from the fckng interface technology between yasni.com and google.com failed illegitimate image search engine worker stupidness.
You fckd brained google.com search engine image worker, my legal complaint never ever is anything with the account holding uploading this ugly-narrow-dark-man-photo public on internet.
Comparable complaints occurred with yahoo.com, but yahoo.com in old days used to some technical brain and they figured out ho is holding the images on internet.
My gut tells me this ugly man is someone invaluable and enjoys for putting his ugly-narrow-eyed photo associated with my valuable name. He should be the one complaining about google.com that his name and twitter.com account uploaded his photo is hided from google.com. valuable many people would file against google.com that google.com fails to track well known image hosting domains. But, this man probably enjoyed that yasni.com incorrectly linked twitter.com photo to an URL that did not have anytink from the photo; did not have the photo. Then even liked that he an invaluable ugly man even though as the infringing photo uploader, is on internet. Only thieves likes uch sick things. Even if so, the problem continution is the crime of google.com.
Google.com law department is a failure in law, shame in internet law history.
Google.com should pay to me for violating my rights again and again, wasting my extremely valuable time on this ugly-narrow-eyed -dark man photo, without any reason arbitrarily continuing to associate this ugly man photo to my valuable name as if may valuable name something to do with such insect-looking man. using this ugly-narrow-eyed-dark-violating photo.
On legal complaints it is not usual to explain that the photo is of an insect-narrow-eyed-dark man, there are not much place to explain all, but it is definite that this photo in the hand of google.com search engine, infringed on my legal rights, and google.com arbitrarily takes any photo and links anywhere arbitrarily. Google.com law department worker who linked the twitter.com hosted/kept/shown ugly-dark-narrow-eyed-photo to my-complaint (which explained the error link), should be punished and should pay to me at least $5000. Such a bandit on google.com only harms innocent people internet legal rights abusing absolute law.
Google.com is paying to so called law people rather to make them commit crime to arbitrarily linking images to valuable names. The chillings effects.org is supposed to teach law, but the described case is stupid google.com search engine image worker arbitrary tags. Chillings.com is not supposed to waste times of law students by cases of image server technology knowledges.
Google.com image search engine should not index images if its workers are stupid what they are doing.
Google.com illegal image search engine worker motto is 'steal any image link to any valuable name or help to identity-thieves of internet'.
One might say, what the fck, internet is nothing to worry, there are importnt things on Earth, anyone knows how google.com image search engine workers screw internet. But, I like proper technologies, even the google.com declares statements different from the stupid google.com. Probably google.com say yes anything to keep any rights to harm people names, copyrighted content. Google.com image search engine screwws internet law, there is none on Earth to teach google.com law workers that they are themselves the internet criminals there. hgame on google.com legl department, shame tht such stupids are called as law workers. These workers are earning big money by nothing but ttacking innocent people internet rights.
One can tell google.com stupişd la worker that the interface beteen yasni.com and google.com image search engine hould be engineered by a bright engineer, stupid law orkers should ask engineer help.
Google.om never replies any tehnical problem reports/complaint. One needs to send complaint as legal notification as a victim of a special case. Shame that such stupids of google.com attacks to innocent people, but none can fight against their harm. Google.com law department is only an identity-thief helper.
